<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>music tech radar - music technology reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://musictechradar.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://musictechradar.com</link>
	<description>music technology reviews</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 03:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Floyd Mayweather vs De La Hoya or Hip Hop Takeover?</title>
		<link>http://musictechradar.com/floyd-mayweather-vs-de-la-hoya-or-hip-hop-takeover/</link>
		<comments>http://musictechradar.com/floyd-mayweather-vs-de-la-hoya-or-hip-hop-takeover/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 02:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Keyboards]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[distribution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musictechradar.com/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After Floyd Mayweather Jr. easily outpointed Carlos Baldomir to win the welterweight championship in November 2006, he stood at the podium at the post-fight news conference and broke down in tears as he announced his retirement from boxing. Despite the emotional outpouring, few believed Mayweather was serious, rather that most figured he was simply overcome [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://imageshack.us"><img src="http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/1949/mayweathermos010907468xuq5.jpg" alt="Image Hosted by ImageShack.us" align="left" border="0" /></a>After Floyd Mayweather Jr. easily outpointed Carlos Baldomir to win the welterweight championship in November 2006, he stood at the podium at the post-fight news conference and broke down in tears as he announced his retirement from boxing. Despite the emotional outpouring, few believed Mayweather was serious, rather that most figured he was simply overcome by the moment.</p>
<p>As it turned out, he had been.</p>
<p>Less than two months later, Mayweather agreed to face Oscar De La Hoya.  Mayweather outpointed De La Hoya in May 2007, during a fight that shattered all boxing revenue and pay-per-view records.  After beating Ricky Hatton in December, Mayweather even took time to beat the Big Show in Wrestlemania.  After the Big Show spectacle news outlets reported that plans were in motion for Mayweather-De La Hoya II to take place Sept. 20, 2008.</p>
<p>Should you cross it off the schedule because of Mayweather&#8217;s most recent announcement?</p>
<p>Mayweather, 31, announced his retirement from boxing again this past Friday in a move that appears much more serious than his impromptu declaration two years ago. We hear that the fight with De la Hoya was scheduled for Sept 13 or Sept 20, 2008.  While this is only our opinion, we highly doubt Mayweather will miss this payday and seal his immortality as one of the greatest fighters ever.</p>
<p>The controversy about Mayweather&#8217;s potential retirement is sure to generate a frenzy at the box office. So get your <a href="http://www.teamonetickets.com/oscar-de-la-hoya-vs-floyd-mayweather-jr-tickets.html">Oscar De La Hoya vs Floyd Mayweather Jr. tickets</a> soon.</p>
<p>We also know that Floyd has started his own label - Philthy Rich Records - and is currently looking for artists to sign. He definitely has the money needed to open the doors for any artist he chooses to sign. We think the fight might go on, but then again Floyd might just concentrate on taking over the rap game with a stable of his own hand picked artists. Only time will tell, we&#8217;ll keep our eyes on it for you.<br />
<img src="http://tinyurl.com/4o8rs9" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://musictechradar.com/floyd-mayweather-vs-de-la-hoya-or-hip-hop-takeover/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nabster v. Rhapsody</title>
		<link>http://musictechradar.com/nabster-v-rhapsody/</link>
		<comments>http://musictechradar.com/nabster-v-rhapsody/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 00:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rockstar</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[distribution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musictechradar.com/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

To Nab or to Rhap or to skip them all together?
I&#8217;ve heard about both for a while but haven&#8217;t tried either of them.  Both offer &#8220;listen-on-demand&#8221; services for what they claim to be &#8220;large digital libraries.&#8221; If you have or currently use them we&#8217;d love your feedback. If you haven&#8217;t, the images above link [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.kqzyfj.com/click-2869252-10361858" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.tqlkg.com/image-2869252-10361858" border="0" alt="7-day Free trial of Napster" width="125" height="125" align="top" /></a><a href="http://www.kqzyfj.com/click-2869252-10304542" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.awltovhc.com/image-2869252-10304542" border="0" alt="Rhapsody" width="125" height="125" /></a><a href="http://www.kqzyfj.com/click-2869252-10304542" target="_blank"><br />
</a></p>
<p>To Nab or to Rhap or to skip them all together?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve heard about both for a while but haven&#8217;t tried either of them.  Both offer &#8220;listen-on-demand&#8221; services for what they claim to be &#8220;large digital libraries.&#8221; If you have or currently use them we&#8217;d love your feedback. If you haven&#8217;t, the images above link to free trials - I am going to try both and report back. If you haven&#8217;t tried them you&#8217;re welcome to try the free trials, please report back using the poll in the first sidebar or comment on this post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://musictechradar.com/nabster-v-rhapsody/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Big Ass Fans</title>
		<link>http://musictechradar.com/big-ass-fans/</link>
		<comments>http://musictechradar.com/big-ass-fans/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 21:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rockstar</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Workstations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musictechradar.com/big-ass-fans/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Big Ass Fans.com is not what I expected but I can’t resist giving credit to the Big Ass marketing team. The Big Ass guys are creating a memorable brand for their industrial Destratification Fans, aka big ass commercial ceiling fans.  The Big Ass Fan brand is a great example of marketing basics - create [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.bigassfans.com/images/headers/header_02.gif" height="89" width="521" /></p>
<p>Big Ass Fans.com is not what I expected but I can’t resist giving credit to the Big Ass marketing team. The Big Ass guys are creating a memorable brand for their industrial Destratification Fans, aka big ass commercial ceiling fans.  The Big Ass Fan brand is a great example of marketing basics - create memorable buzz around a quality product.</p>
<p>So what’s a big ass fan? A six- to 24-foot diameter ceiling fan that uses immense size -not speed- to move massive amounts of air over large spaces.</p>
<p>I guess Big Ass Fans aren’t just found in Hip Hop, you can find them around the world in locations from Airports-to-Zoos. Check out the unique marketing approach for these <a href="http://www.bigassfans.com" target="_blank">Ceiling Fans</a> at the Big Ass Fans website, <a href="http://bigassfans.com" target="_blank">bigassfans.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://musictechradar.com/big-ass-fans/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Itunes screws song writers</title>
		<link>http://musictechradar.com/itunes-screws-song-writers/</link>
		<comments>http://musictechradar.com/itunes-screws-song-writers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 03:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sexysusie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[itunes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musictechradar.com/itunes-screws-song-writers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
An iTunes download costs 99 cents. The songwriter will get just 3 cents. So just what is the true value of music?
suppose you write a song, a truly great song. One that stays in people&#8217;s minds for years and years, that countless recording artists cover, that bands play in your local bar and you hum [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://imageshack.us"><img src="http://img440.imageshack.us/img440/8776/itunesbuttonlogo300x300su7.jpg" border="0" alt="Image Hosted by ImageShack.us"/></a><br/><a href="http://g.imageshack.us/g.php?h=440&#038;i=itunesbuttonlogo300x300su7.jpg"></a></p>
<p>An iTunes download costs 99 cents. The songwriter will get just 3 cents. So just what is the true value of music?<br />
suppose you write a song, a truly great song. One that stays in people&#8217;s minds for years and years, that countless recording artists cover, that bands play in your local bar and you hum while you&#8217;re in the shower. A song like Like a Rolling Stone, Satisfaction, Imagine, What&#8217;s Going On?, Respect, Good Vibrations, Johnny B. Goode, Hey Jude, Smells Like Teen Spirit, or What&#8217;d I Say? How much should the writer of such a song get paid for such an amazing contribution to popular culture? Let&#8217;s look at it another way&#8230; how much should the record company get paid for their part in allowing that song to take its rightful place in popular culture? Well, let&#8217;s look at iTunes where the price of music is strictly regulated&#8230;<br />
An iTunes download costs 99 cents in the USA. Currently the songwriter should receive the statutory royalty rate of 9.1 cents per download.9.1 cents is less than 10% of the price of the download. So apparently 90% of the value of the download is in things other than the song!</p>
<p>OK, so the performer needs to get paid too. That&#8217;s reasonable, and their share will be negotiated as part of their deal with the record company. That could be around 8.4 cents. The producer might receive around 2.1 cents.</p>
<p>However, that means that people other than the songwriter, artist and producer are getting three quarters of the money!</p>
<p>What the hell are they doing to earn that?</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s go back to the poor old songwriter, slaving for a paltry 9.1 cents.</p>
<p>Guess what&#8230; the RIAA wants to reduce that to 8%. And not 8% of the 99 cents retail price of the download, but to 8% of the wholesale price of around 70 cents.</p>
<p>So the songwriter will get just 5.7%. Everyone else will share 94.3%!</p>
<p>Remember that the RIAA works for the record companies, not for songwriters, artists or producers.</p>
<p>Oh, and Apple - the company behind iTunes - would like to see the songwriter&#8217;s cut shaved down even further, to just 4%. And that&#8217;s 4% of wholesale. So the songwriter will get less than 3 cents per download. 96 cents will go to all the rest. We at musictechradar do not use itunes and we advise artists to not use this commercial service to try and sell music, you would be better served giving it away free online and selling cds at shows or your own personal website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://musictechradar.com/itunes-screws-song-writers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should you soundproof your studio?</title>
		<link>http://musictechradar.com/should-you-soundproof-your-studio/</link>
		<comments>http://musictechradar.com/should-you-soundproof-your-studio/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Recording]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[soundproof]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musictechradar.com/should-you-soundproof-your-studio/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
It actually depends on the location of your studio. Soundproofing can give different sounds to your recording if you have to much or not enough. I have been in million dollar studios that have no soundproofing, and they record flawless.There are two aspects to soundproofing. Firstly, it is important that sounds coming in from outside [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://imageshack.us"><img src="http://img99.imageshack.us/img99/6195/vocalbooth2wi6.jpg" border="0" alt="Image Hosted by ImageShack.us"/></a><br/></p>
<p>It actually depends on the location of your studio. Soundproofing can give different sounds to your recording if you have to much or not enough. I have been in million dollar studios that have no soundproofing, and they record flawless.There are two aspects to soundproofing. Firstly, it is important that sounds coming in from outside of your studio do not affect your recording. Secondly, it is equally important that sounds emanating from your studio do not annoy your neighbors. Irritated neighbors will reflect every bit of irritation they suffer back towards you, and probably more!But let&#8217;s look at incoming noise. What effect does it have on the recording process?Incoming noise has two effects. One is that it can enter your microphones and get onto your recording. The other is that it will interfere with the monitoring process so that you can&#8217;t listen clearly to the sounds you are recording and mixing.Some types of music are more problematical than others&#8230;The type of music that suffers most from incoming noise isn&#8217;t even music - it is speech. Speech has the unfortunate property of having gaps between the words. Any background noise will be clearly audible in the gaps because there is nothing to mask it.(If you work in audio for picture then so-called Foley effects are even more vulnerable. Foley effects include very quiet sounds such as the rustle of clothing. Plainly, absolute silence is required.)But getting back to music - what type of music is most sensitive to noise?The answer is classical music, because it alternates between loud and quiet passages. The quiet parts of the music won&#8217;t be loud enough to cover the background noise.Next up is any kind of acoustic music, such as folk music. Quiet instruments once again cannot mask the noise.If you have a heavy rock band however, the guitars and drums will be so much louder than the background noise that you will hardly notice a problem.The maximum resilience against noise is to be found in electronic music, including hip hop. Any sounds that are purely electronically generated or sampled do not require microphones, hence there is no possibility of picking up background noise.With regard to monitoring, the greater the dynamic range of the music you record (that is the difference in level between the quiet and the loud sections) the more you will be affected by background noise. Any style of music that is loud all the time will be pretty much OK, unless you live next door to an airport or train station!So the quality of soundproofing you need depends on the kind of sounds you record. If you record Foley effects for film or TV, then you need an absolutely silent studio. A desert location would be good. If you record speech, then you will have to take very great care over your sound insulation.But with other styles of music, there is some leeway. You don&#8217;t always need to have a completely soundproof room, or if you have no outside noise soundproofing is not necessary at all.Which is just as well since complete soundproofing is almost impossible to attain. And of course it is very expensive. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://musictechradar.com/should-you-soundproof-your-studio/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The future of music distribution</title>
		<link>http://musictechradar.com/the-future-of-music-distribution/</link>
		<comments>http://musictechradar.com/the-future-of-music-distribution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 01:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[distribution]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[music distribution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musictechradar.com/the-future-of-music-distribution/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Music distribution has changed and is changing by the day. Long gone are the days of A&#38;R&#8217;s going to live shows looking for the next big act to sign. Most labels dont even have full time A&#38;R&#8217;s anymore. Most major labels are losing money and have layed off alot of employees. The future of major [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://imageshack.us"><img src="http://img155.imageshack.us/img155/4062/blankmediarx8.jpg" alt="Image Hosted by ImageShack.us" border="0" /></a>Music distribution has changed and is changing by the day. Long gone are the days of A&amp;R&#8217;s going to live shows looking for the next big act to sign. Most labels dont even have full time A&amp;R&#8217;s anymore. Most major labels are losing money and have layed off alot of employees. The future of major labels is very dim, If it is your dream to get signed by a major label we think you should not count on it. Even the super artists are selling a quarter of what they used to sell. Nobody buys music anymore. CD floor space was taken away from best buy,walmart,and target this year and next year they might not even carry cds. People still use cds&#8217;s for there cars and stereo&#8217;s but nobody buys them everybody burns them, blank cds outsell artist cds 4 to 1. The future of music distribution is free music. Most labels are moving this direction. There are sites already in place to handle it. Spiral frog is one example for major artists, and wyplanet.com is a new site that has gotten alot of press and we think is still in test phase. We like wyplanet because it focus&#8217;s only on indie artists. Sites like CD Baby are basically a joke, nobody buys music from them, nobody! They stay in business by artist sign up fee&#8217;s. Don&#8217;t waste your money. Itunes and rhapsody are mostly for the major artists and that is all they will ever advertise. They dont support indie artist other than maybe letting you try and sell something on there site. It is all a waste of time, giving away your music free is the future of music distribution. How is it going to work for the artist. Well lets use wyplanet for example. They let you set up a myspace type a page then you upload and share your music thru your own player. Wyplanet pays the artist according to how much individual traffic your page gets. You post the player everywhere and it drives fans to your page in turn you build a fan base and get paid at the same time. Sites like wyplanet are the future of music distribution. All five of the major labels are setting up sites like this to give away all there music free. Some are talking putting actual commercials in between tracks, which I think would annoy the hell out me. Either way the future of music is free download. Limewire has been giving away free music for years and they are still up there and are never going away. I haven&#8217;t bought a cd in five years except at the occasional indie show where bands are selling there own cd. But as far as buying from a store, I am not going to do it, I do not support Major labels, If I like a artist I will download it for free as should everybody. If you are a band and you want to build your fan base there is no faster way then giving away free cds at shows. Free music is the future of music distribution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://musictechradar.com/the-future-of-music-distribution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Picking a Mastering Engineer</title>
		<link>http://musictechradar.com/picking-a-mastering-engineer/</link>
		<comments>http://musictechradar.com/picking-a-mastering-engineer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sexysusie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Mastering]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musictechradar.com/picking-a-mastering-engineer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
When you finish your recording and you want to get it mastered you need to be careful of who you get to master your recording. Alot of engineer&#8217;s will say they can master your recording, JUST TO GET MORE MONEY OUT OF YOU but alot of them dont have a clue of what mastering is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://imageshack.us"><img src="http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/4541/masteringshotmq1.jpg" border="0" alt="Image Hosted by ImageShack.us"/></a><br/></p>
<p>When you finish your recording and you want to get it mastered you need to be careful of who you get to master your recording. Alot of engineer&#8217;s will say they can master your recording, JUST TO GET MORE MONEY OUT OF YOU but alot of them dont have a clue of what mastering is let alone know how to do it. Here is a list of what should get done when a track is mastered, ask the so called mastering engineer what he is going to do to your track when he masters it. If he does not say 90% of what is on this list then he is a fraud. It will be evident when you get his answer if he knows what he is doing or not. In almost every mastering session, the following actions are performed:
<ol>
<li><span style="color: #ff0000" class="Apple-style-span">Optimizing average and peak volume levels for proper relative loudness</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff0000" class="Apple-style-span">Signal processing - compression &amp; EQ</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff0000" class="Apple-style-span">Arranging tracks in final sequence</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff0000" class="Apple-style-span">Timing of the space between tracks</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff0000" class="Apple-style-span">Establish a sonic &#8220;field&#8221; for all tracks</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff0000" class="Apple-style-span">Place track markers at head of all tracks</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff0000" class="Apple-style-span">Remove unwanted noise like clicks, pops, hiss</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff0000" class="Apple-style-span">Clean-up start and ending of each track (including fades)</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff0000" class="Apple-style-span">Insert Master Track Log - the PQ codes required for replication</span></li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://musictechradar.com/picking-a-mastering-engineer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roland SP-555</title>
		<link>http://musictechradar.com/roland-sp-555/</link>
		<comments>http://musictechradar.com/roland-sp-555/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fast eddie</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Production]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Roland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musictechradar.com/roland-sp-555/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
This Sampling Workstation Makes Creative Sampling Fun and Easy! It isnt a Akai mpc ,but it is easier and has alot of bells and whistles the mpc doesnt.The Roland SP-555 sampling workstation brings fun, ease of use, and some amazing new wrinkles to the SP family. This unit includes some great new features, such as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://imageshack.us"><img src="http://img364.imageshack.us/img364/2645/sp555large1qy1.jpg" border="0" alt="Image Hosted by ImageShack.us"/></a><br/><br />
This Sampling Workstation Makes Creative Sampling Fun and Easy! It isnt a Akai mpc ,but it is easier and has alot of bells and whistles the mpc doesnt.The Roland SP-555 sampling workstation brings fun, ease of use, and some amazing new wrinkles to the SP family. This unit includes some great new features, such as Super Filter and Loop Capture, while making sampling easier than ever. You can bring sounds into the SP-555 via several input options, and use its onboard effects for great performances. This versatile unit easily interfaces with practically any DAW, and its control surfaces make it easy to create and manipulate great loops and samples on the SP-555.The SP-555 is definately a fun and creative piece of studio equipment. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://musictechradar.com/roland-sp-555/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>For live performances Mackies rule !!</title>
		<link>http://musictechradar.com/for-live-performances-mackies-rule/</link>
		<comments>http://musictechradar.com/for-live-performances-mackies-rule/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 03:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Speakers/Monitors]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[mackie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musictechradar.com/for-live-performances-mackies-rule/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
For live performaPower and Clarity in an Incredibly Lightweight Active PA Enclosure!The Mackie SRM450v2 active loudspeaker gives you plenty of power and studio-style clarity, even at high volumes. The SRM450v2 provides efficient power: its Class D LF amp provides 300 watts, while a 100-watt amp powers the titanium dome compression driver for high frequencies. You [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://imageshack.us"><img src="http://img390.imageshack.us/img390/4610/srm450v2largecm1.jpg" border="0" alt="Image Hosted by ImageShack.us"/></a><br/><br />
For live performaPower and Clarity in an Incredibly Lightweight Active PA Enclosure!The Mackie SRM450v2 active loudspeaker gives you plenty of power and studio-style clarity, even at high volumes. The SRM450v2 provides efficient power: its Class D LF amp provides 300 watts, while a 100-watt amp powers the titanium dome compression driver for high frequencies. You get ultra-low distortion and amazingly full sound from this speaker, which can be pole-mounted or used as a floor monitor wedge. Mackie&#8217;s active electronic time alignment, phase-correction, and EQ work together with the components to give the SRM450v2 incredible sound. I will say that I own older model mackie speakers and they perform flawless with clarity at 120 decibles. That is as loud as a jet taking off. You cannot go wrong with mackies for a live performance. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://musictechradar.com/for-live-performances-mackies-rule/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An analog masterpiece</title>
		<link>http://musictechradar.com/an-analog-masterpiece/</link>
		<comments>http://musictechradar.com/an-analog-masterpiece/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 19:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Production]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[prophet 08]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musictechradar.com/?p=24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Dave Smith Instruments Prophet &#8216;08 Module is an analog fan&#8217;s dream machine! With 52 knobs to tweak, you&#8217;ll have a hard time tearing yourself away from this synth. Includes four LFOs, three envelopes, and a gated sequencer per voice.A knob tweakers dream come true. A must have for any creative producer  
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://imageshack.us"><img src="http://img180.imageshack.us/img180/9333/prophet08modlargeya6.jpg" border="0" alt="Image Hosted by ImageShack.us" /></a>The Dave Smith Instruments Prophet &#8216;08 Module is an analog fan&#8217;s dream machine! With 52 knobs to tweak, you&#8217;ll have a hard time tearing yourself away from this synth. Includes four LFOs, three envelopes, and a gated sequencer per voice.A knob tweakers dream come true. A must have for any creative producer<a href="http://imageshack.us"></a>  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://musictechradar.com/an-analog-masterpiece/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
